Chris's picture

no offense, and i dont mean

no offense, and i dont mean to sound like an asshole, but wouldnt it make sense that a true "professional" disinfo tool would try and prop himself up and even protect himself from accusations of disinfo by going after obvious disinfo shills? im not saying Arabesque and Albanese are truly "professional" disinfo but it would make perfect sense for them to spout off about disinfo so much if in fact thats what they themselves are. Albanese was working on an entire film about "disinfo" while Arabesque seems to do nothing BUT talk about "disinfo" and combating it(when hes not pushing the OCT version of the Pentagon attack). do we really need Arabesque and others to point out what is and isnt disinfo for us all the time? how valuable are those contributions really? i would argue a lot of it is needlessly divisive diversions that add to a sense of confusion, especially for newbies. i cant imagine what it would be like reading a site like Arabesques as a new 9/11 skeptic.

Reply