Thanks for posting this here, and letting me know. During my short lived 911blogger activation before being silenced there, whenever someone needed to stand up against the mob rule there, he was always on message IMHO.

I also admired the way he could dismiss protected idiots there with a couple of polite well chosen words, when I would be sucked into their flame wars at length.

Since this prosecution kicked in, he has not been so active against the fake truthers at blogger, but I am sure he doing his best for the cause elsewhere, and so I will reach deep in my pockets for this one.

BTW at the head of the page of the link above to 'we are change' is this :.

"Followers in the anti-war movement do not realize that by accepting the [government’s] 9/11 explanation they have undermined their own opposition to the war. Once you accept that Muslim terrorists did it, it is difficult to oppose punishing them for the event. [Anti-war activists] do not understand that if you grant the government its premise for war, it is impossible to oppose the war.” - Paul Craig Roberts

Well said by PCR and a well chosen header by Bruno.
This is much more succinctly put that my argument that 'fog of war' mentality means that Lihop is damaging to the motivation of people in the truth movement blah blah.

Amusingly, Loose Nuke tried to condescendingly argue for pages with me that to suggest such logic was absurd, and it did not exist, wheras the chief idiot has to my knowledge never commented on the point (not through lack of trying on my part).

Fair winds Bruno! and here is a good one for old times sake.
http://911blogger.com/news/2009-11-05/chomsky-confronted-911-admits-liho...