Home ยป WOW! Informed, Reasoned Analysis of the CIT/Pentagon Debate - Thanks to Robin Hordon

Keenan's picture

Your analogies are so completely off the mark...

Submitted by Keenan on Tue, 2010-07-20 22:18.

that I have to wonder if you are intentionally refusing to understand the difference between the WTC demolition evidence vs the Pentagon flyover inference. Your analogies are so ludicrous and obviously deceptive that they really should be called straw men, rather than analogies.

But your last paragraph is the real zinger:

"I'd rather not be part of a 9/11 truth campaign if that means going along with a critical part of the official story - even if we know it to be false - out of some misguided public relations concern, and letting the specific perpetrators of the murderous attack on the Pentagon walk free - do you?"

WTF?!!! Going along with the official story? How is arguing that AA77 did not crash into the Pentagon going along with the official story? Now you've really lost me...

»

Reply