"It really comes down to a very simple equation once you strip away all the BS and intentional obfuscation. If the CIT witnesses are telling the truth flyover of the plane they saw is a fact."

Talking about plane bombs, plane switches, smaller planes, etc. are all pure speculation based on no evidence whatsoever and have no bearing on the CIT evidence. These arguments are just obfuscation and misdirection from the core CIT issue and don't alter the conclusion that "If the CIT witnesses are telling the truth flyover of the plane they saw is a fact."

Gretavo to even suggest that CIT's evidence leading inexorably to the conclusion of flyover isn't important is wrong on every level.

Keenan and Gretavo I am not going to get into this again here because my time is better served on the CIT forum I think. I have had enough of going over and over this with countless people who don't want to "get it" or worse who want to obfuscate it with endless speculation. If you don't want to get it then you won't get it and my words will be meaningless to you anyway. So let's not waste each others time and I will mosey on down the road.

Thanks for the forum and for listening.