Annoymouse's picture

listened

good job.

I think conflating holocaust revisionism w/911 Truth is best served by drawing parallels between the 2 events as social control hoaxes. An innocent population VICTIMIZED by pure evildoers without cause. A people terrorized by a "shadowy outside enemy" into blindly supporting their leader/protectors. A fable of good vs evil. A foundational myth giving carte blanche "justification" for further acts of evil, from behind a "VICTIM" facade. You get the idea.

But even then, it's really only for the intermediate/advanced Truther whose mind is newly fertilized by acceptance of 911 Truth. Yes, an intensive study of the deep politics behind how the US/West came to have a ZOG, and why our ZOG perpetrated 911, will invariably beg questions about the holocaust narrative. BUT, regardless of whether we're 100% right about holocaust revisionism, if someone you seek to "reach" about 911 is still a total blue-piller, given that holocaust revisionism has been uniquely demonized through our lives such that it's a much more entrenched engineered memeplex than the 911/warrenterruh hoax, the blue-piller will likely balk once 911 Truth & H. revisionism are conflated. Thus it would most likely serve as no-planes/space-beams are designed to serve, IE evoke that conditioned response of buzz-click dismissal in brainwashed blue-pillers, keeping their head safely in the sand. So it's arguably a wise "political strategy" in seeking critical mass for 911 Truth, to keep H. revisionism far away from entry-level 911 Truth, and let people's own self-guided journey down the rabbit hole lead them to H. revisionism if they're so inclined. It frankly takes a pretty exceptional person to overcome the generations of propaganda surrounding the holocaust narrative. Makes disseminating 911 Truth a more uphill battle than it needs to be.

Ditto re the Apollo/moon matter.

Reply