First time since September 2011, and only second time ever!

New incident

http://www.nytimes.com/2013/04/18/us/mass-injuries-reported-in-texas-fer...

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-22195495

http://uk.reuters.com/article/2013/04/18/uk-usa-explosion-texas-idUKBRE9...

http://www.salon.com/2002/01/26/assaad/

Fort Detrick's anthrax mystery

Who tried to frame Dr. Ayaad Assaad, a former biowarfare researcher at the Army lab? Was it the same person responsible for last fall's anthrax mail terrorism?
By Laura Rozen

Topics: News

Their URL leads to a GoDaddy parking page, and their twitter feed has had no action for more than a year. What happened to Cosmos, Albanese, and the rest of the fake truthers there? DId they give up on 9/11 truth? On their "eleventh month of every year" campaign?

Two explosions rock the finish line at the Boston Marathon. The coverage is at once reminiscent of 9/11 and Oklahoma City. We are at the crucial point where we have just been informed by the media that authorities are questioning someone related to the bombings. As in OKC, it is reported that undetonated devices have been found. These, as in OKC, are supposed to be key to identifying the bad guys. Let's see if they are denied as soon as a Ryder truck is found.

No scapegoat yet.

Likely scapegoats: tax protestors? truthers? muslims?

[I was almost surprised to see this ancient canard pop up again on an otherwise not-particularly-interesting Portland Indymedia thread about 9/11. What was most pleasing was the way it was quickly and efficiently dispatched by other users. Portland Indymedia has become a toxic place for discussions of 9/11 --- this thread, ironically, was a breath of fresh air.]

http://portland.indymedia.org/en/2013/04/422707.shtml?discuss

Remember
08.Apr.2013 07:21
Garth

Vote for the best ad here: https://app.wizehive.com/voting/otp

WTCD is endorsing this one, btw... https://app.wizehive.com/voting/view/otp/13054/1185000/0

Saudi Arabia Behind Attacks, Insurers Tell Court: http://www.insuranceinsider.com/-1242713/26

They can't have assumed they would win a case against Saudi Arabia--my guess is they were otherwise compensated (perhaps simply by a rise in premiums after 9/11) and that this is just a way to make mo' money...

After doing a search for the listed companies I found this article that contains some interesting analysis of the effect of 9/11 on the insurers/reinsurers: http://opim.wharton.upenn.edu/risk/downloads/archive/arch257.pdf

Judge: Act of war precludes 9/11 environmental claim

3/20/2013 COMMENTS (0)

By Bernard Vaughan

NEW YORK (Reuters) - A federal judge in New York on Wednesday dismissed a lawsuit over cleanup costs related to the attacks of Sept. 11, saying the attacks were an "act of war." But the judge said the reasoning did not necessarily apply in a bigger case over damages caused by the attacks.

See here: http://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2013/02/the-talibans-ne...

And here's a primary source for the author's assurances of this group's responsibility for recent attacks...  Note the reference to Omar Farooq!

http://thebalochhal.com/?p=2008

Kid's Purim Costume Idea: The Burning Twin Towers?

Seven-year-old twins premiere their homemade costumes in Israel

By: Ashley Baylen

This is an excerpt from a Keller column in the NYT about Jimmy Savile, the British television icon who is accused of molesting young girls throughout his career. Keller asks how it was possible that while Savile's behavior was an open secret in media circles, no one ever exposed him...

Sunstein a University Professor
Legal scholar recognized for wide-ranging impact beyond field

Tuesday, February 19, 2013

Cass Sunstein, widely regarded as one of the most influential legal scholars of his generation, has been named a University Professor, Harvard’s highest honor for a faculty member.

This propaganda does double-duty--goes to eleven, as it were. Not only will the masses who accept the official story be drawn to a fake account of the 9/11 plot that they will mistakenly associate with fact, fake truthers will be able to cream themselves at the mere mention of John O'Neill, the "man who knew it all".

9/11 Trial Officers Explain “Ransacking” of Legal Documents
February 15, 2013, 5:44 pm ET by Arun Rath

Some light was shed yesterday on the apparent “ransacking” of legal materials from defendants in the 9/11 trial.

A recent post on Portland Indymedia wistfully asks:

"Is the end of the so called "911 truth movement" at hand? Not counting the loons that claim Sandy Hook is a hoax, all that's left is one balding architect pushing his non-profit to pay his bills"

As avid followers of the War on Terror™ know, the most recent shocking development in the trial of the millennium has something to do with the government listening in on the conversations of the accused with their counsel through an extensive set of microphones installed in the courtroom. Given the fact that even for a show trial this case is laughable from start to finish, here is my take--possibly the first installment in a series...

The death of Phillip Marshall, author of a book laying much of the blame for 9/11 on “Saudi Intelligence” is being considered as a possible “conspiracy” by a local newspaper, not to mention 9/11 websites and bloggers on both sides of the gun rights debate.

Hi Guys,

Wake up!

Yeah yeah veteranstoday can/is flaky, but just to get up to speed on what is possibly happening, let's forget that for a moment. I think the Zionists are on the move.

http://www.veteranstoday.com/2012/07/18/breakingunconfirmed-sec-clinton-...