Is the Entire Fake Truth Movement Preparing to "Jump the Big Shark?"

gretavo's picture

It sure looks that way, and my spidey sense is tingling at the way that so many different let's say "fake truth outlets" have very recently all of a sudden begun talking as if big developments were afoot, when in fact nothing much seems to merit such a perception. I'll copy stuff wholesale below as a way of beginning our collective deconstruction of what may well be the start of the endgame...

First, from "Gordon Duff":

GORDON DUFF: GOV. JESSE VENTURA PROVES 9/11 COVER-UP, WILL AMERICA’S GOVERNMENT FALL?

December 18, 2010 posted by Gordon Duff · 270 Comments 

"thought it was a bomb...walked out through the hole..burning wreckage..no plane parts...threatened to keep silent"

FORMER VICE PRESIDENT CHENEY ACCUSED OF ENGINEERING PENTAGON ATTACK

DONALD RUMSFELD CITED AS POSSIBLE ACCOMPLICE

By Gordon Duff STAFF WRITER/Senior Editor

Confirmed sources in the Nigerian government tell us, in order to
keep former Vice President Cheney out of prison for crimes involving
Nigeria, $500,000,000 in bribes have been promised, negotiated by former
President George H.W. Bush.   Now, only a day later, Cheney faces
possible charges, so many charges they can only be imagined, for
planning the Pentagon attack on 9/11.

TV host, Jesse Ventura, former Navy Seal, former Governor of
Minnesota, on a one hour documentary on prime-time American television,
makes an open and shut criminal case tying Cheney, Rumsfeld and
officials throughout the US government with complicity in the planning,
execution and subsequent cover-up of the 9/11 attack on the Pentagon.


YouTube - Veterans Today -

According to experts on 9/11, engineers, pilots, intelligence
officers and members of our military, Jesse Ventura “hit the nail on the
head.”  Ventura, using evidence developed over 9 years by hundreds of
individuals, outlines the utter impossibility of the government’s cover
story on 9/11 and systematically debunks it using testimony and
scientific evidence.

Ventura cites, in an interview with a 9/11 commissioner, a possible
motive for the Pentagon attack being included with the attacks on the
World Trade Center.  $2,300,000,000,000, yes 2.3 trillion US dollars had
disappeared, cited only the day before in a televised statement by
Secretary Rumsfeld, money “gone missing” from the Pentagon’s
accounting.  The area of the Pentagon hit by a missile or destroyed by
explosives or both contained all records of this missing money.

NO PLANE, NO WAY, NOT EVEN CLOSE

Ventura proves, beyond any doubt that no airplane every hit the
Pentagon.  As the video shows, not even a highly trained airline pilot
was capable of the maneuvers claimed.  Long before, it had been proven
that the 757 was incapable of the task, either the maneuvers or the
speed and trajectory.  The plane would have come apart, there is no
disagreement with this and hasn’t been for some time, yet nothing had
been done.  Why?

It is also clearly shown that there is absolutely no evidence of any
kind showing a plane hit the Pentagon, no wreckage, no bodies, no
luggage.  Items claimed to have been taken to Dover Air Force Base,
bodies, plane parts, were never at the Pentagon as both video and
testimony prove.

There is also proof that the government threatened witnesses, telling them to support the “aircraft scenario.”

NO MUSLIMS, NO HIJACKERS, NO BOX CUTTERS, ALL PROVEN LIES FINALLY

The basis for the conspiracy theory regarding Muslim hijackers with
box cutters was based on supposed phone calls made by Barbara Olson,
wife of Bush Solicitor General.  Solicitor General Olson claimed he
talked to his wife on a cell phone, spoke with her at length, while she
described the hijackings as now dramatized by Hollywood.  When it was
proven that a cell phone is incapable of making such calls, Olson
claimed it was a “seat back phone.”  When it was proven that there were
no seat back phones on American Airlines 757 aircraft, nothing further
was asked.

Then investigations shows he received one call, lasting “0? seconds. 
Ventura questions as to whether Olson was duped or complicit?  Should
he be arrested too?  Was his wife, Barbara, ever really on the plane?

Then Ventura looks into the flight itself.  Not only was the flight
recorder “dead” but during the flight itself, the transponder was turned
off.  Even more suspicious, the plane disappeared from radar for 28
minutes.

There is no discussion of this 28 minutes, but speculation, perhaps
no longer speculation, has long been that the flight landed.  As to what
happened then, we cannot guess, or can we.  One of my friends, a former
Pentagon official, had a friend on that aircraft.  Not long ago, he
asked me.

“Gordon, what do you think happened to him,
do you think he was executed?  Bullet in the brain as they stepped off
the plane or something even worse?”

Ventura didn’t go there.  None of us want to.  It requires visualizing a scene out of Auschwitz.

Can Americans be so brutal, so devious, so traitorous?  It isn’t just
Jesse Ventura that is willing to risk his life to bring it out, Fox
News journalist Geraldo Rivera, several weeks ago, debunked the Building
7 collapse at the World Trade Center as “controlled demolition.”


YouTube - Veterans Today -

9/11 COMMISSION DUPED, ADMITS THERE WAS NO REAL INVESTIGATION AT ALL

Commission video’s redacted to remove testimony by the Secretary of
Transportation, transcripts altered, witnesses blocked, evidence, tons
of evidence of government conspiracy withheld, this is the case against
the government.  Threats, intimidation, going on for years, this is
proven.  Were there more than threats, murders, “heart attacks” or
threats against families?  Ventura proves the Pentagon was a government
conspiracy, he “names names.”  Geraldo makes any other explanation for
Building 7 other than “controlled demolition” pure insanity.

IGNORING EVIDENCE, PROOF OF DICTATORSHIP OR ARE ARRESTS PLANNED?

It isn’t as though the evidence presented by Governor Ventura and
Geraldo Rivera or even the other stories, Judge Napolitano’s revelations
of knowledge of the attacks as early as 9/11, was new.  All has been
know, all highly credible and all systematically ignored, attacked by
the press, suppressed by courts, officials at every level.

9/11 and the recent revelations aren’t proof of a conspiracy by 2
men, or Israel.  It is proof that there never was an Al Qaeda and that
the deaths, two wars, the 9/11 deaths and the carnage across the world
wrought by the United States was part of a criminal conspiracy, one that
could only be perpetrated by a dictatorship under the guise of
representative democracy.

Everything we have seen, and millions around the world have watched,
nobody can ignore it anymore, it all says that what has happened is
something no American would allow, not if this still were America. 
Jesse Ventura proved something startling to most, suspected by some.  He
proved that, at some point in our past, 10 years, more, we don’t know,
our government was overthrown.

MORE WIKILEAKS, MORE ASSANGE, MORE 9/11 COVER-UP

The strongest and most vocal opponent of a new 9/11 investigation is
Julian Assange of Wikleaks.  If any individual outside the US government
were to be named as most complicit in a 9/11 cover-up, it would be
Julian Assange.


YouTube - Veterans Today -

Everything since then, certainly 9/11 and now, the news about Iran
and, especially Wikileaks, all subterfuge.  When former National
Security Advisor Zbigniew Brzezinsky cited Wikileaks on a PBS interview,
televised nationally, that Wikileaks was the word of an intelligence
agency, Israel never reported it or responded.  Instead, they attributed Brzezinski’s quote to me:

“Speaking
to Haaretz, Duff added that ‘it sticks out like a sore thumb that
WikiLeaks is obviously concocted by an intelligence agency.’”

This is what Brzezinski told Judy Woodruff of PBS:

ZBIGNIEW BRZEZINSKI: But
I think the most serious issues are not those which are getting the
headlines right now. Who cares if Berlusconi is described as a clown.
Most Italians agree with that. Who cares if Putin is described as an
alpha dog? He probably is flattered by it.

The real issue is, who is feeding Wikipedia on this issue — Wiki —
Wiki — WikiLeaks on this issue? They’re getting a lot of information
which seems trivial, inconsequential, but some of it seems surprisingly
pointed. …The very pointed references to Arab leaders could have as
their objective undermining their political credibility at home,
because this kind of public identification of their hostility towards
Iran could actually play against them at home.

It’s, rather, a question of whether WikiLeaks are being
manipulated by interested parties that want to either complicate our
relationship with other governments or want to undermine some
governments, because some of these items that are being emphasized and
have surfaced are very pointed.

And I wonder whether, in fact, there aren’t some
operations internationally, intelligence services, that are feeding
stuff to WikiLeaks, because it is a unique opportunity to embarrass us,
to embarrass our position, but also to undermine our relations with
particular governments.

BUSH, OBAMA, CONTINUING DICTATORSHIP, CONTINUING COVER-UP, CONTINUING WAR

Barak Obama ran for president on a platform based on justice, ending
the wars and bringing accountability to government after 8 years of
scandals, deceit and what can only be called “hooliganism and piracy.” 
Instead, he has done nothing, the wars continue, drugs are flowing from
Afghanistan even faster than before, 9/11 evidence, now overwhelming and
impossible to ignore is still ignored.

Americans looking for reform wonder if Bush left at all.  Those
complicit are, though few admit it, disturbed by seeing America led by
an African American.  The visible public face on the very well financed
attacks on President Obama are all very much based on race hatred.  This
has long been the most effective tool for keeping Americans divided and
compliant.  How else could a major political movement be successful
supporting the least popular and least successful policies in American
history?

Who would want a return to policies enacted by the least successful
president in American history, George W. Bush, who left office with an
approval record listed at 22%.  Many would find a number lower, even
half, more credible.  President Clinton, after surviving impeachment for
lying about sexual misconduct left office with 68% approval.  Thus, we
connect the dots and wake up one morning, informed, enraged and utterly
powerless.

Even through the assaults on President Obama, many financed by the
Koch brothers,  tied to ultra-nationalists in Israel, whether there was a
real change of government is not clear.  As Jesse Ventura pointed out,
while Vice President Dick Cheney was getting reports of a plane
approaching the Pentagon, seemingly even orchestrating the attack
himself, President Bush was in Florida reading to school children.  Two
years of Obama have been similar, too similar.

What can we assume from this?  Is, in fact, the President of the
United States no longer Commander in Chief?  Did our government hand
itself over to “shadow” rule with Bush or did it happen earlier, after
President Reagan’s dementia made him unable to manage the cabal that
surrounded him?  How long have we been operating under no Constitution
at all?

The headline on today’s New York Times:

SENATE BLOCKS BILL FOR ILLEGAL IMMIGRANT STUDENTS

The headline on today’s Washington Post:

TOP US SPY REMOVED AFTER THREATS

What is “their” message?  Certainly not “never again.”  In fact we
know that “again” is just around the corner, an Iran war with or without
a new 9/11, planned and executed by the same folks, older, not wiser
and certainly more pathologically insane and murderous.

 

 

Then, from Kevin Barrett--it seems Christopher Bollyn is back and has been busy playing "connect the dots""

Truth Jihad Radio Sat. 12/18/10, 5-7 pm Central, American Freedom Radio (archived here.) Call-in number: (402) 237-2525 or post your questions to my Facebook page.

First hour: Christopher Bollyn, author of Solving 9/11
- the most comprehensive book on Israeli involvement in the 9/11
attacks. Christopher Bollyn has just made public new evidence concerning
the destruction of 9/11 evidence. He writes:

I
look forward to discussing the destruction of the steel from the World
Trade Center on Saturday, December 18. I am sending you the following
information so that you understand the basics of what I will be talking
about. To understand the Mossad role in the destruction of the steel
from the WTC is to understand a very crucial part of the 9/11 crime.
I
posted a piece that discusses the Mossadniks who ran the international
trading network at Hugo Neu Schnitzer. These two Mossad punks, Nathan
Fruchter and Jehuda Saar, had worked for Marc Rich at Glencore AG and
other companies he ran in Stamford, Connecticut since the mid-1990s.
Hugo
Neu is the company that recycled much of the steel from the World Trade
Center by sending it to Chinese mills where it was melted.
The article is here> http://www.bollyn.com/wikileaks-and-the-911-crime-gang There
is much more to Hugo Neu's connection to the Mossad. Hugo Neu, which
was created by the current owner's father, who was originally working
with Walter Rothschild and Meno Lippauer when they all came from
Germany, is an investor in this Mossad venture capital fund:
AquaAgroFund http://www.aquagrofund.com/Investors.aspx#HugoNeu One of the managing partners of the AquaAgroFund is Nir Belzer, who is co-founder of the Millenium Material Technologies Funds. http://www.aquagrofund.com/Team.aspx#Nir Which
he founded with Oren Gafri, who specializes in military applications of
thin coatings, exactly like what was used at the World Trade Center on
9/11
http://www.mmtfund.com/management.html I hope to be able to get the chapter on this subject written in the next few days.