"Core of Corruption": New 9/11 Documentary Corrupts the Core of 9/11 Truth With LIHOP
This is an interesting film if only because it seems oblivious to its intrinsic contradiction. It begins with a long discussion of a LIHOP scenario and features LIHOPper extraordinaire Sander Hicks talking about how the U.S. government was protecting the "9/11 hijackers" - not "alleged hijackers" of course, because Sander Hicks, Jon Gold, and others who claim to be interested in the truth about 9/11 seem to believe that arabs and muslims are guilty until proven innocent.
Later in the movie the demolitions are discussed, with a seeming focus on WTC7. Also included, which at first was somewhat surprising, was the story of the "dancing Israelis" - but of course it is predictably in the context of the allegation that Israel was dutifully tracking the terrorists in the U.S.
The Spring 2009 LIHOP Offensive continues!
Core of Corruption now on Google Video
Link to YouTube trailer where comments can (and should!) be left: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9SbSqe9Me_c
Hi G, I want to elaborate on
Hi G,
I want to elaborate on your phrase "Sander Hicks, Jon Gold, and others who claim to be interested in the truth about 9/11 seem to believe that arabs and muslims are guilty until proven innocent".
Someone like Jon Gold does not really believe that Arabs and Muslims are guilty of 9-11, he and other shills of his kind know that Arabs did not do it. But in public, they "pretend" to think that Arabs are responsible and try to convince others to believe in this disinformation.
(How can I tell Jon Gold is a disinfo agent? see http://www.wtcdemolition.com/blog/node/2155 )
touché, Juan
I can't say with any certainty what they truly believe, though I have a strong suspicion that you aren't too far off the mark. I say "seem to believe" as opposed to "believe" for that reason. People can come to their own conclusions as to why they give the impression that they hold accusations against arabs and/or muslims to less stringent standards than any other people. What can't be denied is that their peculiar attitude is bigoted, in effect if not intent.
Core of Corruption is TOTALLY LIHOP
The first hour and a half or so pretty much say "The 9/11 attacks were hijackings committed by members of al Qaeda, and the U.S. government ignored warnings of the coming attacks." The second half, which includes a fair amount of information on explosives in WTC7 and the towers, says essentially "There were bombers in the twin towers on 9/11, and WTC7 (alone?) had to have been pre-rigged by someone with foreknowledge of the al Qaeda attacks--and WTC7 was a 'spook house' so that must have been the CIA". My guess is that the limited hangout will say that the twin towers were *not* pre-rigged but that instead a whole slew of "Qaeda suicide bombers" had infiltrated the building.
MISSING FROM Core of Corruption:
David Ray Griffin
Pentagon Explosion (no plane crash)
Pennsylvania "Crash"
lack of evidence for hijackings
DISINFO AGENTS in Core of Corruption:
Sander Hicks
Greg Palast
Make no mistake - the makers of Core of Corruption and anyone who promotes it are working, in effect if not intent, to destroy the truth movement from the inside.
Core of Corruption Disinfo
Thy director dost protest too much...
...when asked about media complicity. Not to mention he keeps a crystal square and compass right over his workstation.
;-)
Core of Corruption seems to have an unprecedented level...
...of online publicity...
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=core+of+corruption&aq=5&oq=core+of
Someone has been very busy posting links to it EVERYWHERE. David Icke, Alex Jones, Ron Paul, JREF, the Spurs, anyone with a foum has apparently been hit. According to some posters at True Faction they also seem to have *emailed* everyone who has signed up at the Loose Change forums.
Looks like this is "the big one" in terms of LIHOP offensives! Will real truthers speak out?
Kevin Barrett tries to resurrect this BS LIHOP film
By promoting a seemingly irrelevant factoid about some "art students". Kenny's Sideshow gives it a sort of skeptical look , thanks to Willyloman for telling it like it is!
4 Suspects in World Trade Center Before 9/11 Doing Construction?
willyloman said...
They are apparently an art group called Gelitin. They list on their website, aside from pictures of them standing around with semi-hardons, multiple "performances" and art openings in New York around that time, one of which in 2000 was listed at the World Trade Centers.
http://www.galerieperrotin.com/artiste_bio.php?menu=artists&&domaine=art...
wilyloman said...
more insight into this story here.
http://artoftheprank.com/2007/08/02/the-b-thing-by-gelitin/
apparently the idea was to get pictures of them all standing outside the 91st floor of the trade center. That's why they had all the boxes and that is why they kept tract of the security passes... didn't want security people seeing them removing the window cladding and the windows.
These guys have been doing their "art" for decades together. Many years since 911 and prior to 911. And aside from the fact that this took place in early 2000, these guys are clowns, not demolitions experts.
I am surprized that Core of Corruption fell for this.
But then again, the Core of Corruption "evidence" page seems to be dedicated to Jon Gold, a well known LIHOPer and hangout limiter over at 911 Blogger, so, this is not all that surprizing.
willyloman said...
Jeff Rense covered this in 2003... odd that Core of Corruption just now catches onto it...
http://www.rense.com/general43/over41.htm
kenny's sideshow said...
That's why I put the ? on the title willy.
Thanks for the JG heads up. I hadn't gone that far into their website. Also for the rense article.
C of C has a number of MSM videos with the 'prior knowledge' angle. Sometimes that focus may be a tip off to LIHOPers and disinfo agents.
So is C of C 'poisoning the well,' with this artist story that may be easily debunked and so trying to cast doubt on the other Mossad activities of 9/11 that are often talked about?
Anyway, their MSM videos are important historical evidence of planted stories, they do contain some truth, to turn opinion to the 'incompetence' side. A lot of money has been spent to 'upgrade' homeland security because of that 'incompetence.' And it diverts attention away from the more core issues.
C of C.....controlled opposition?
I hope not but the 9/11 truth and anti-war movements are so often getting their hearts broken.